-
Feb8
Minneapolis Banking Foreclosure Scheme is “So Simple That the Mind is Repelled”
Filed under: Banking; Tagged as: 60, airborn, Alex, bank, beck, Bill, california, Celente, coast, deception, depression, doomsday, economic, economy, estate, event, funny, Gerald, glenn, gold, Jim, jones, law, maher", martial, Minutes, money, new, obama, order, Paul, peter, real, recession, Rogers, Ron, schiff, secret, silver, stuff, survival, suspended, The, To, toxic, tyt, war, world, zombie25 CommentsThe TARP funds are reimbursing the banks for their losses in full, but then the banks are turning around and selling these properties and making unbelievable profits! The corrupt judges & attorneys are in on the game, and allowing this crap to happen. These thugs are having a field day in America. They are looting us totally, with Washington DC leading the way! inflation.us Sign Up Today! George4title speaks with a Minnesota Real Estate Broker. Video Footage shot in Palm Springs. Minnesota Foreclosure Laws www.foreclosure.com www.realtytrac.com stopforeclosure.com Residential Mortgage Foreclosures in Minneapolis www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us Fed-led research reveals need for better Twin Cities foreclosure data www.minneapolisfed.org
Related External Links
25 Responses to “Minneapolis Banking Foreclosure Scheme is “So Simple That the Mind is Repelled””
-
rayme4raw February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Sorry to here about your pension plans or government pension plans, the good news is that when people learn of this Ponzi scheme after most of the money is gone, both the US and Canadian government will lose a lot of power.
-
rayme4raw February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Thanks, although I’m not the first to use it. Wish I had know this a decade earlier. Now every billionaire out there is suggesting that there will be another stock market crash. So much for all the retirement funds.
-
uclaztec2 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
And republicans are happy that corporations won a supreme court case to allow them carte blanc ability to donate for elections?!
LOL! Wake up America. Your rights and your ability to defend yourself are being stripped with your endorsement. This is a fascist country clocked in republican democracy.
-
uclaztec2 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Facsism anyone?
-
jimjimbo85 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
No, Daly was disbarred, and the court’s decision was vacated for numerous reasons. See In Re Daly, 284 Minn. 567, 171 N.W.2d 818 (1969); 294 Minn. 351, 200 N.W.2d 913 (1972). Anybody who cites the Credit River decision in support of a claim for a borrower to keep his house is either ignorant of the law, or a con-artist. The Supreme Court concluded that Jerome Daly was colluding with the justice to get a favorable verdict – after he was already barred from appearing in court. HE WAS DISBARRED!
-
FMTFXE22 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Good news. Just heard that John McCain is not running and has endorsed J.D. Hayworth
-
jimjimbo85 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Of all the cloak-and-dagger conspriacy angles this guy is alleging, it should be a very simple matter for him to answer my very objective questions. If he cannot even do that – why should we believe anything else he has to say? It’s basic fact-checking. No respectable news outlet would ever publish this you-tube story without verifying some of the basics. And the mere existence of this lawsuit is easy to verify – if only the maker of the video would respond.
-
jimjimbo85 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Even after the passing of the 20 days, the plaintiff must bring a motion for a default judgment. I am simply asking for the details of this lawsuit he claims to have started. So – let’s see the paperwork on the Summons, Complaint and the Motion for Default Judgment. If he can’t answer my simple questions, he should pull his video and post a retraction and an apology.
-
jimjimbo85 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
I never said he should win his lawsuit, nor did I imply that he had won his lawsuit. I am stating that the legal theory of “criminal fraud” is not something a private citizen can pursue in a lawsuit. That the judge is refusing to do anything with the lawsuit is entirely predictable because even in a default (where the defendants have not responded within the time alloted – typically 20 days), the plaintiff still must prove up its case.
-
hplaserjet2001 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Good comparison of a stock market and casino, both are sure to take your money and give you little or nothing back.
-
hplaserjet2001 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
I’ve been paying into the Canadian government pension plan for 33 years. It’s automatically deducted from our pay cheques, we have no choice. For 30+ years my father said there would be nothing in the pension when I retire. Unfortunately, it looks like he was right.
-
hplaserjet2001 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
At no time did he state that they won the lawsuit. He stated that the judge refused to do anything with the lawsuit.
Get a hearing aid.
-
hplaserjet2001 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Shills this is being done to you too, wake up.
In 2009, the Federal Reserve engineered 20+ trillion dollar bailouts equaling 40% of the private wealth created in the US since 1776.
The deficit during October and November 2009 totaled $297 billion or $4.9 billion per day.
The Office of Management and Budget reports that the US government will experience deficits of tens of trillions of dollars for the next 70 years.
-
hplaserjet2001 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Queen Elizabeth II is the legal owner of one sixth of the land on the Earth’s surface, more than any other individual or nation. This amounts to a total of 6.6 billion acres (27 million km²) in 32 countries.
37.5% of the Earth is owned by 147 states.
21% of the Earth is owned by 26 people.
41% of the Earth is owned by 1% or less of the population on Earth.
85% of the Earth’s population own nothing.
Source: Kevin Cahill, “Who Owns the World: The Hidden Facts Behind Landownership”
-
PontVedra February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Spoke with an employee just last wk and it appears the banks are calling in debts that are delinquent by garnishing bank accounts.Bottom line, the customer was delinquent on a couple loans;therefore the bank just simply helped themselves to their savings and checking to bring those accounts current.Apparently, it’s in the fine print ppl;the banks r scraping for every red cent and they r taking no prisioners-Lesson:close bank accounts anon! It’s legal if you signed when opening that account!Uh oh
-
This is used for Educational Use only.. Can’t forget those liars… oops lawyers!
-
Aye, this is Legal Insurance Fraud!haha how long we Got before Insurance Companies that backed these bad boy loans, before they go Bust. I would advise Selling Insurance Companies on the Stock Exchange!!!
-
screw banks !!!!
-
jimjimbo85 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Really, you started a lawsuit? What is the case number? Who are your lawyers? Who specifically did you sue? In Minnesota, private citizens cannot sue for ciminal fraud – that is a power reserved to the county attorneys and the office of the attorney general. You don’t get to “win” your lawsuit just because the defendants did not answer. You still have to prove your case on the facts – and on the law. What you have described can satisfy neither.
-
cori800888 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
you can do better than that shill boy…
this bank fraud in collusion with govt is now rather well documented…. it ruins a nation.
-
cori800888 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
THANK YOU ! thank you,, thank you.
this is serious business
-
AvidLifestyle February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
It’s great people are loosing the homes the couldn’t afford in the 1st place!!! I LMAO!!!
-
shadetree6981 February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Your sources are bullshit!
-
Anothercoilgun February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
Protecting the goons. I hope the people wake up now.
-
exvandale February 8th, 2010 at 1:57 am
pamellapamelina72 no not tell him..
just tell me how you did it …plz be specific..
